Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 6 VETAPP 1 - Nash v. Brown

Nash v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
July 1995
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 38 U.S.C. § 7104

Relies on Morton v. Ruiz · Gilbert v. Derwinski · Manio v. Derwinski · Schafrath v. Derwinski · Fugere v. Derwinski

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the Board must identify those findings it deems crucial to its decision and account for the evidence which it finds to be persuasive or unpersuasive. These decisions must contain clear analysis and succinct but complete explanations. A bare conclu-sory statement, without both supporting analysis and explanation, is neither helpful to the veteran, nor “clear enough to permit effective judicial review,” nor in compliance with statutory requirements.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.