Nash v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
July 1995
most recently cited
Relationships
Applies 38 U.S.C. § 7104
Relies on Morton v. Ruiz · Gilbert v. Derwinski · Manio v. Derwinski · Schafrath v. Derwinski · Fugere v. Derwinski
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the Board must identify those findings it deems crucial to its decision and account for the evidence which it finds to be persuasive or unpersuasive. These decisions must contain clear analysis and succinct but complete explanations. A bare conclu-sory statement, without both supporting analysis and explanation, is neither helpful to the veteran, nor “clear enough to permit effective judicial review,” nor in compliance with statutory requirements.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ussery v. Brown
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.