Mintz v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently August 2016
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 38 U.S.C. § 1121 · 38 U.S.C. § 1122 · 38 U.S.C. § 1141 · 38 U.S.C. § 1142 · 38 U.S.C. § 1151 · 38 U.S.C. § 1310 · 38 U.S.C. § 1318 · 38 U.S.C. § 2302
Relies on Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc. · Colvin v. Derwinski · Manio v. Derwinski · Gardner v. Brown · Gardner v. Derwinski
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“service connection under that section would be entitled to any applicable benefits under chapters 11 or 13. However, such a claimant would not be entitled to chapter 23 burial benefits, including reimbursement of $1500 under 38 U.S.C. § 2307 , unless service connection is established under a statutory provision other than 38 U.S.C. § 1151 . Simply stated, a determination of”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Alleman v. Principi“title 38; conspicuously absent is any reference to chapter 23. Therefore, a claimant receiving a favorable ruling of”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Alleman v. Principi“disability or death compensation under [chapter 11] and [DIC] under chapter 13 of”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Alleman v. Principi
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.