Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 6 VETAPP 360 - Buzinski v. Brown

Buzinski v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
June 2016
most recently cited

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently June 2016

120199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 38 U.S.C. § 1804 · 38 U.S.C. § 3704 · 38 U.S.C. § 3732 · 38 U.S.C. § 7261

Relies on William Marbury v. James Madison · United States Accardi v. Shaughnessy · Mennonite Board of Missions v. Adams · Vitarelli v. Seaton · United States v. Shimer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A veteran is liable to the VA through either indemnification or subrogation for any compensation paid by the VA to the mortgagee due to default and foreclosure on the veteran’s VA guaranteed mortgage. 38 U.S.C. § 3732 ; 38 C.F.R. § 36.4323 ; see also Stone v. Derwinski, 2 Vet.App. 56 (1992). A veteran remains liable for the loan guarantee indebtedness even though he may have transferred the property to a new owner who has assumed liability for and subsequently defaulted on payment of the mortgage. 38 U.S.C. § 3732 ; 38 C.F.R. § 36.4323 ; see also Travelstead, [supra]); Smith, [supra]; Branham v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 93 (1990). In the instance of a mortgage assumption, the veteran remains liable to the VA unless he secures a release of liability. 38 U.S.C. § 3732 ; 38 C.F.R. § 36.4323 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the due process inquiry does not turn on whether a property owner knew that a foreclosure proceeding was taking place, but rather turns on whether the mortgagee has used his best efforts in good faith to put the owner on notice that a foreclosure is to take place.... The constitutionality of a foreclosure procedure depends not on the subjective understanding of the property owner, but on the objective propriety of the procedures used.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.