Gannet Corp. v. Stevens’s Empirical Analysis
1968
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 49 (Wagner-Peyser Act) · 48 U.S.C. § 1561 · 48 U.S.C. § 1574 · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1184 (§ 214 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. Paul · Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co. · William Truax v. Mike Raich · Mondou v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad · Sperry v. State of Florida the Florida Bar
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(T)he Congressional policy is that American labor be protected and that temporary workers be admitted only when it tends to serve the national economy, the cultural interests, and the welfare of the United States, by facilitating the entry for temporary residence of aliens whose specialized experience or exceptional ability would best serve the American needs.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Rogers v. Larson“coming temporarily to the United States to perform . . . temporary services or labor”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Rogers v. Larson“each case must be decided on its own particular facts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Rogers v. Larson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.