Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 6 VI 362 - Colby v. Colby

Colby v. Colby’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
August 2016
most recently cited

2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently August 2016

2 state decisions

30196819701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Burch v. Burch · James v. Henry · Pavletich v. Pavletich · Sachs v. Sachs · 155 F. Supp. 860 - Sachs v. Sachs

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We conclude that while incompatibility of temperament in the Virgin Islands Divorce Law does not refer to those petty quarrels and minor bickerings which are but the evidence of that frailty which all humanity is heir to, it unquestionably does refer to conflicts in personalities and dispositions so deep as to be irrecon cilable and to render it impossible for the parties to continue a normal marital relationship with each other. To use the ancient Danish phrase, the disharmony of the spouses in their common life must be so deep and intense as to be irremediable. It is the legal recognition of the proposition long established in the earlier Danish law of the islands that if the parties are so mismated that their marriage has in fact ended as the result of their hopeless disagreement and discord, the courts should be empowered to terminate it as a matter of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.