6 Wash. App. 494 - Williams v. Young’s Empirical Analysis
1972
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
June 1988
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 77 Wash. 2d 255 - Ancheta v. Daly · 69 Wash. 2d 472 - No. Pac. Transp. Co. v. Wa. U. & T. Comm. · 80 Wash. 2d 13 - Newbury v. State Department of Public Assistance
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“substantial rights of the petitioners may have been prejudiced because the administrative findings, inferences, conclusions, or decisions are: . . . clearly erroneous in view of the entire record as submitted and the public policy contained in the act of the legislature authorizing the decision or order.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.