Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 6 Wash. App. 96 - State v. Maryott

6 Wash. App. 96 - State v. Maryott’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
14
states following
August 2007
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 3 district · 38 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently August 2007 · most notably 96 Wash. 2d 383 - State v. Hartzog (1981), Washington Fed. of State Emp. v. State (1995)

5 federal appellate · 3 district · 38 state decisions — followed in 14 states

1501971198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Allen · Snyder v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts · Palko v. State of Connecticut · In re Oliver · Brown v. State of Mississippi

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In criminal prosecutions the accused shall have the right to appear and defend in person.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The common law of England was expressly adopted by legislative enactment at the first session of the legislative assembly of this territory, and there is no doubt that the ancient right of one accused of crime under an indictment or information to appear in court unfettered, is still preserved in all its original vigor in this state.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the thought, expression, manner and content of the person using the drugs.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.