Arbuckle v. McClanahan’s Empirical Analysis
1873
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently January 1974
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ . . . The material allegations of the bill being denied by answer, and not sustained by evidence, it was not error in the Court below to dissolve the injunction without waiting for a report, especially, when the reference made to the commissioner was unauthorized and improper. ‘The Court of Chancery is always open to re-instate as well as to grant an injunction. The Complainant should always be ready to prove the allegations of his bill of injunction.’ (Ch. Taylor,) Radford’s Ex’ors vs. Innes’s Ex’ors, 1 Hen., and Munford, 8. . . ^ ” ( 6 W.Va. at 108 ) •”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ingram v. Erwin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.