Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 60 A3D 1100 - Martin v. State

Martin v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
9
states following
June 2024
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Crawford v. Washington · Pointer v. Texas · Davis v. Washington · Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts · Freeman v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “surrogate testimony of the kind [the testifying scientist] was equipped to give could not convey what [the certifying analyst] knew or observed about the events his certification concerned, i.e. , the particular test and testing process he employed. Nor could such surrogate testimony expose any lapses or lies on the certifying analyst's part.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.