Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

60 Cal. 603

Weil v. Bent

California Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1882

California Supreme Court · decided 1882-06-28

Appeal by defendant F. Palomares from a judgment for the plaintiff in the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Howard, J. The affidavit of service of summons is in the following form: M. J. Wicks, being duly sworn, deposes and says: I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party .to nor interested in this action, etc., etc. There was an amended complaint in the case with an affidavit of service on defendant Palomares.

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently April 1891

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1882-06-28

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

The Court:

¶1This is an appeal by defendant Palomares from a default judgment. The affidavit of service of summons does not show that affiant was over the age of eighteen years at the time of the service. On authority of Maynard v. McCrellish, 57 Cal. 855, and Howard v Galloway, supra, p. 10.

¶2Judgment is reversed and cause remanded.

/60/cal/603 · .json · Public domain