Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 60 CAL2D 472 - Lipka v. Lipka

Lipka v. Lipka’s Empirical Analysis

1963

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
2
states following
December 1998
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 45 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently December 1998 · most notably 1 Cal. 4th 865 - People v. Pinholster (1992), United States ex rel. Hetenyi v. Wilkins (1965)

1 federal appellate · 45 state decisions

3101963197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 46 Cal. 2d 690 - Primm v. Primm · 42 Cal. 2d 36 - Dexter v. Dexter · Webster v. Webster · 103 Cal. App. 2d 405 - Kalmus v. Kalmus · 18 Cal. 2d 445 - Keener v. Keener

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(1) The infliction of grievous mental suffering as a ground for divorce is a question of fact, to be deduced from the circumstances of the case in light of the intelligence, refinement, and delicacy of sentiment of the complaining party. [Citations.] “(2) The sufficiency of the corroborative testimony in a divorce action lies within the sound discretion of the trial court. [Citations.] “(3) When a finding of fact is attacked on the ground that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, the power of an appellate court begins and ends with the determination of whether there is any substantial evidence, contradicted or uncontradicted, which will support the finding. [Citation.] ””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “DIVISION OF COMMUNITY PROPERTY AND DEBTS”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.