Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 60 Cal. 2d 666 - In re Zerbe

60 Cal. 2d 666 - In re Zerbe’s Empirical Analysis

1964

Citation profile

162
cited by 162 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

159 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 162 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2019 · most notably 16 Cal. 3d 392 - Agricultural Labor Relations Board v. Superior Court (1976), 1 Cal. 3d 855 - Nino v. Gladys R. (1970)

159 state decisions

630196419701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 57 Cal. 2d 450 - Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior Court · Republic Aviation Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board · Neal v. State of California · Abelleira v. District Court of Appeal · In Re McVickers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 162 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a defendant is entitled to habeas corpus if there is no material dispute as to the facts relating to his conviction and if it appears that the statute under which he was convicted did not prohibit his conduct.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Habeas corpus is available in cases where the court has acted in excess of its jurisdiction. [Citations.] For purposes of this writ as well as prohibition or certiorari, the term `jurisdiction' is not limited to its fundamental meaning, and in such proceedings judicial acts may be restrained or annulled if determined to be in excess of the court's powers as defined by constitutional provision, statute, or rules developed by courts. [Citations.] In accordance with these principles a defendant is entitled to habeas corpus if there is no material dispute as to the facts relating to his conviction and if it appears that the statute under which he was convicted did not prohibit his conduct. [Citations.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “... the Legislature in dealing with trespasses ... has specifically subordinated the rights of the property owner to those of persons engaging in lawful labor activities.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.