Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 60 CALAPP2D 303 - Shotwell v. Bloom

Shotwell v. Bloom’s Empirical Analysis

1943

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
4
states following
January 2010
most recently cited

42 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently January 2010 · most notably 44 Cal. App. 3d 504 - Uccello v. Laudenslayer (1975), 47 Cal. 4th 970 - Chavez v. City of Los Angeles (2010)

42 state decisions

16019431950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cutter v. Hamlen · Joerger v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. · Cristadoro v. Von Behren's Heirs · Allen v. Wachter · 5 Cal. 2d 749 - Kane v. Mendenhall

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]f there is some hidden defect in the premises, or danger thereon, which is known to the lessor at the time of making the lease, but which is not apparent to the intending lessee, the lessor is bound to inform the latter thereof, and failing so to do, he is liable for injuries to the tenant arising therefrom. -”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““Stated another way, the landlord’s liability, except in the case of public and semi-public buildings where his liability is greater (see King v. New Masonic Temple Assn., 51 Cal.App.2d 512 [ 125 P.2d 559 ]), is no greater to the invitee of the tenant than it would be to the tenant himself. ’ ’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.