Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 60 CALAPP2D 358 - People v. Slater

People v. Slater’s Empirical Analysis

1943

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
December 2008
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently December 2008

14 state decisions

601943195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on People v. Howard · 5 Cal. 2d 714 - People v. Ottey · People v. Kelley · People v. Wells · People v. French

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “‘ ‘ In the present case, as stated, the evidence is legally sufficient to establish an unlawful killing; but after viewing the case in the light of all the surrounding circumstances as they are shown by the evidence, and especially taking into consideration the fact that the fatal shooting occurred during a heated verbal altercation which started after the deceased went up the back stairs and pounded on appellant’s door with a broom handle and shouted to her to come out; also appellant’s age and the fact that she was suffering from a chronic heart ailment and the effects thereof, we are not satisfied that the evidence establishes any greater degree of crime than manslaughter. As stated in 13 Cal.Jur. 609, ‘When a mortal blow is struck upon a sudden quarrel or in the heat of passion, upon adequate provocation, the actual intent is disregarded. In such case, although the intent to kill may exist, it is not that malicious intent which is an essential element in the crime of murder. ’ And applying that doctrine to the present situation, we are not prepared to hold as a matter of law that this is not such a case.” (Italics ours.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Were we compelled, as formerly, to either affirm the judgment or reverse the case, we would be driven to the latter course”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.