Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 60 CALAPP2D 564 - Gray v. Bybee

Gray v. Bybee’s Empirical Analysis

1943

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
1
states following
January 2014
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently January 2014 · most notably 35 Cal. 4th 180 - Varian Medical Systems, Inc. v. Delfino (2005), 31 Cal. 2d 542 - Steen v. City of Los Angeles (1948)

3 federal appellate · 28 state decisions

7019431950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Doudell v. Shoo · 20 Cal. 2d 697 - Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Superior Court · People v. Black's Food Store · Jackson v. De Benedetti · 28 Cal. App. 632 - Laam v. McLaren

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Whatever interest the plaintiff [John Gray] may have had in the property by virtue of the homestead which his wife filed within three months after their marriage, it was terminated by the foreclosure of the trust deed. Mrs. Gray took title to the real property subject to the trust deed and prior to her marriage. The homestead was also subject to the trust deed. John Gray relinquished whatever homestead interest he may have had by executing and delivering to the owners of the land his quitclaim deed. He had full knowledge of the entire transaction. The court therefore properly refused to quash the execution.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The granting or denial of a temporary restraining order is discretionary with the trial judge (14 Cal.Jur. 180, sec. 7) and amounts to a mere preliminary or interlocutory order to keep the subject of litigation in status quo pending the determination of the action on its merits. People v. Black's Food Store, 16 Cal.2d 59, 105 P.2d 361, 362; 14 Cal.Jur. 180, sec. 9.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.