In Re Parker’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
74 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 76 later decisions — most recently January 2013 · most notably 29 Cal. 4th 228 - Cooley v. Superior Court (2003), 28 Cal. 4th 1179 - People v. Hurtado (2002)
74 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Gerstein v. Pugh · Kansas v. Hendricks · County of Riverside v. McLaughlin · 10 Cal. 3d 222 - Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board · 52 Cal. 3d 894 - People v. Pieters
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 76 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`[d]ue process requires only that the procedure adopted comport with fundamental principles of fairness and decency. The due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment does not guarantee to the citizen of a state any particular form or method of procedure.' [Citation.]”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“engage in sexually violent criminal behavior.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“(1) the private interest that will be affected by the official action; (2) the risk of an erroneous deprivation of such interest through the procedures used, and the probable value, if any, of additional or substitute procedural safeguards; (3) the government's interest, including the function involved and the fiscal and administrative burdens that the additional or substitute procedural requirement would entail; and (4) the dignitary interest in informing individuals of the nature, grounds, and consequences of the action and in enabling them to present their side of the story before a responsible government official.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.