Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 60 Conn. App. 369 - State v. Burrus

60 Conn. App. 369 - State v. Burrus’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
May 2017
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Golding · Soares v. Vestal · State v. Floyd · State v. Salz · State v. Jarrett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When reviewing sufficiency of the evidence claims, we impose a two part analysis. First, we construe the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the verdict.... Second, we determine whether, from that evidence and all the reasonable inferences which it yields, a [trier of fact] could reasonably have concluded that the defendant was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.... In this process of review, it does not diminish the probative force of the evidence that it consists, in whole or in part, of evidence that is circumstantial rather than direct.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.