Rausch v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
1968
Citation profile
Relationships
Relies on Ungerer & Co. v. United States · F. W. Woolworth Co. v. United States · James Betesh Import Co. v. United States · 48 Cust. Ct. 210 - Commercial Adolfo S. Pagan, Inc. v. United States · Ross Products, Inc. v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Bach and every imported article, mot enumerated in this Act, which is similar in the use to which it may be applied to any article enumerated in this Act as chargeable with duty, shall be subject to the same rate of duty as the enumerated article which it most resembles in the particular before mentioned; and if any nonenumerated article ¡equally resembles in that particular two or more enumerated articles on which different rates of duty are chargeable, it shall be subject to the rate of diuty applicable to rthait one of such two or more articles which it most resembles in respect of the materials of which it is composed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Toys, not specially provided for: ******* Other (except * * *)_35% ad val. *******”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.