Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 60 F.1d 186 - State v. Lagarde

State v. Lagarde’s Empirical Analysis

60 F. 186 · 1894

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
April 1910
most recently cited

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently April 1910

20189419001910decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Robbins v. Taxing District of Shelby Co Tennessee · Leisy v. Hardin · Sawyer · Leloup v. Port of Mobile · Stoutenburgh v. Hennick

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““I do not think it necessary * * * to determine the yet unsettled question of how far proceedings criminal in their character, taken hy individuals or organized bodies of men, tending, if carried out, to despoil one of his property or other rights, may be enjoined by a court of equity.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.