Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 60 F.2d 124 - Persson v. Falsen

Persson v. Falsen’s Empirical Analysis

60 F.2d 124 · 1932

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
November 1967
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently November 1967

3 federal appellate · 3 district ·

301932194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Canada Malting Co. v. Paterson Steamships, Ltd. · Atkies v. Mikkelsen · Elman v. Moller · The Roxen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “whenever the District Judge has acted so at variance from the view held by the Court of Appeals that the appellate court is justified in saying he has exercised his discretion wrongly.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.