Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 60 F.3d 1156 - Zuspann v. Brown

Zuspann v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis

60 F.3d 1156 · 1995

Citation profile

69
cited by 69 later decisions
March 2023
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 6 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 69 later decisions — most recently March 2023 · most notably Thomas v. Principi (2005), Whitley v. Hunt (1998)

19 federal appellate · 6 district ·

2701995200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 38 U.S.C. § 511 · 38 U.S.C. § 7104 · 38 U.S.C. § 7251 · 38 U.S.C. § 7252 · 38 U.S.C. § 7292

Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Federal Deposit Insurance v. Meyer · Davis v. Passman · Carlson v. Green · Bush v. Lucas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We are free to uphold the district court's judgment on any basis that is supported by the record.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “), whose ruling becomes the final decision of the Secretary. 38 U.S.C. § 7104(a). Decisions of the Board may then be reviewed exclusively by the United States Court of Veterans Appeals, an Article I court established by the VJRA. 5 38 U.S.C. §§ 7251, 7252(a), 7266(a). Decisions of the Court of Veterans Appeals are in turn appealable solely to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 38 U.S.C. § 7292(a), which has”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the administrative process created by Congress provides for a comprehensive review of veterans' benefits disputes. Further, Congress has explicitly precluded judicial review of veterans' benefits disputes, which suggests that Congress' failure to create a remedy against individual VA employees was not an oversight.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.