Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 60 F.3d 137 - Haley v. Pataki

Haley v. Pataki’s Empirical Analysis

60 F.3d 137 · 1995

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
March 2022
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently March 2022 · most notably Capital Communications Federal Credit Union v. Boodrow (1997), People Who Care v. Rockford Board of Education, School District No. 205 (1997)

19 federal appellate · 2 district ·

1801995200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2106

Relies on City of Los Angeles v. Lyons · United States v. Munsingwear, Inc. · Sosna v. Iowa · Southern Pacific Terminal Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission · Weinstein v. Bradford

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “applies only in exceptional situations, where the following two circumstances [are] simultaneously present: (1) the challenged action [is] in its duration too short to be fully litigated prior to cessation or expiration, and (2) there [is] a reasonable expectation that the same complaining party [will] be subject to the same action again.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “capable of repetition, yet evading review,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[V]acatur is not required where mootness results from a voluntary settlement reached by the parties.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.