Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 60 F.3d 1421 - 1995-2 v. Dar Datagate Inc

1995-2 v. Dar Datagate Inc’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
December 2024
most recently cited

6 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently December 2024

6 district ·

601990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc. · Monsanto Company v. Spray-Rite Service Corporation · Jefferson Parish Hospital District No. 2 v. Hyde · Fortner Enterprises, Inc. v. United States Steel Corp. · Ingalls v. Roosevelt County

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “device used by a competitor with market power in one market ... to extend its market power into an entirely distinct market.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[T]he controlling consideration is simply whether a total amount of business, substantial enough in terms of dollar-volume so as not to be merely de minimis, is foreclosed to competitors by the tie....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “is satisfied in tie-in cases by the coerced sales contract for the tied item”) (emphasis omitted); Systemcare, Inc. v. Wang Labs. Corp., 117 F.3d 1137 , 1142 (10th Cir.1997) (holding that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.