Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 60 F.3d 1428 - 14702b v. Dar Johnson

14702b v. Dar Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

130
cited by 130 later decisions
February 2019
most recently cited

5 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 130 later decisions — most recently February 2019 · most notably 16160b v. Dar Dar Meanel, 15798b v. Dar Light

5 district ·

610199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Magallanes v. Bowen · Bunnell v. Sullivan · Fair v. Bowen · Cotton v. Bowen · Sample v. Schweiker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 130 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “may rely on expert testimony which contradicts the DOT, but only insofar as the record contains persuasive evidence to support the deviation.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “identify specific jobs existing in substantial numbers in the national economy that claimant can perform despite her identified limitations.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “matching the specific requirements of a designated occupation with the specific abilities and limitations of the claimant”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.