Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 60 F.3d 616 - Spink v. Lockheed Corp.

Spink v. Lockheed Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

60 F.3d 616 · 1995

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
August 2007
most recently cited

12 federal appellate ·

Appellate journey

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 1 (Airport and Airway Extension Act of 2008) · 26 U.S.C. § 410 (§ 1011 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 29 U.S.C. § 1001 (§ 2 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1002 (§ 3 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1052 (§ 202 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1054 (§ 204 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1103 (§ 403 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974)

Relies on Landgraf v. USI Film Products · Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore · Russello v. United States · Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. Russell · Sisson v. Ruby

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] fiduciary with respect to a plan shall not cause the plan to engage in a transaction, if he knows or should know that such transaction constitutes a direct or indirect . . . transfer to, or use by or for the benefit of a party in interest, of any assets of the plan.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]he amendments made by sections 9201 and 9202 shall apply only with respect to plan years beginning on or after January 1, 1988, and only to employees who have 1 hour of service in any plan year to which such amendments apply.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]o the extent our interpretation requires employers to include pre-enactment service years in calculating accrued benefits, it applies retroactively.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.