Truskoski v. ESPN, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
60 F.3d 74 · 1995
Citation profile
20 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 66 later decisions — most recently December 2025 · most notably Blackwood Associates Lp Harvis Trien Beck Pc v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation Lp (1998), Paul Kellogg v. Wayne Strack (2001)
20 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody · Franks v. Bowman Transportation Co. · Golden Pacific Bancorp v. United States · Ryan v. United States · United States v. Sepulveda
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]t is peculiarly within the province of the district court ... to determine the meaning of its own order, and the court's interpretation of its order will not be disturbed absent a clear abuse of discretion.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“for Rule 60(a) purposes, a mistake of law is not a 'clerical mistake,' 'oversight,' or 'omission' " (quoting Warner, 526 F.2d at 1212)); see also Truskoski v. ESPN, Inc., 60 F.3d 74 , 77 (2d Cir.1995) (per curiam) ("That provision, which states in pertinent part that '[c]lerical mistakes in judgments ... may be corrected by the court at any time,' permits only a correction for the purpose of reflecting accurately a decision that the court actually made.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Weeks v. Jones · Kocher“a motion under Rule 60(b)(6), like motions under all parts of the Rule, must be made within a reasonable time.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Marshak v. Sheppard · In Re Stanley
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.