Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

60 F.3d 821

Docket No. 95-6548.

Daniel L. Davis v. Edward W. Murray Pamela Anne Sargent Unknown

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: May 18, 1995. Decided: June 29, 1995.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-06-29

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Fitz v. McCormick

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-06-29

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Daniel L. Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Campbell Alexander, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, VA, for Appellees.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Davis v. Murray, No. CA-94-310-R (W.D.Va. Mar. 17, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/60/f3d/821 · .json · Public domain