Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

60 F.3d 821

Docket No. 95-6449.

Erwin v. Hollers

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Subitted: May 18, 1995. Decided: June 28, 1995.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-06-28

Relies on Browder v. Director Department of Corrections of Illinois · United States v. Robinson · Fitz v. McCormick

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-06-28

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Johnie B. Erwin, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Fred Thurman Hamlet, Sr., Charles Edward Nichols, NICHOLS, CAFFREY, HILL, EVANS & MURRELLE, Greensboro, NC, for Appellees.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant noted this appeal outside the thirty-day appeal period established by Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1), failed to obtain an extension of the appeal period within the additional thirty-day period provided by Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5), and is not entitled to relief under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6). The time periods established by Fed. R.App. P. 4 are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Appellant's failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period deprives this Court of jurisdiction to consider this case. We therefore deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

DISMISSED.

/60/f3d/821 · .json · Public domain