Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

60 F.3d 822

Docket Nos. 95-6410, 95-6411.

Rocky Dee Hines, and Leo Rites Roosevelt Brandon Robert White William Jamison Rick Bailey Michael Sewell v. Richard A. Lanham, Sr. William L. Smith, Leo Rites Roosevelt Brandon Robert White William Jamison, and Rocky Dee Hines Rick Bailey Michael Sewell v. Richard A. Lanham, Sr. William L. Smith

Full caption · 2 consolidated cases

  • Rocky Dee HINES, Plaintiff--Appellant, and Leo Rites; Roosevelt Brandon; Robert White; William Jamison; Rick Bailey; Michael Sewellv.Richard A. LANHAM, Sr.; William L. Smith, Defendants--
  • Leo RITES; Roosevelt Brandon; Robert White; William Jamison, Plaintiffs--Appellants, and Rocky Dee Hines; Rick Bailey; Michael Sewellv.Richard A. LANHAM, Sr.; William L. Smith, Defendants--

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: May 18, 1995. Decided: June 27, 1995.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-06-27

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on In Re: Herman E. Harston

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-06-27

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Rocky Dee Hines, Leo Rites, Roosevelt Brandon, Robert White, William Jamison, Appellants Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Atty. Gen., Audrey J.S. Carrion, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, for appellees.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellants appeal from the district court's order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaints. We have reviewed the records and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Rites v. Lanham, No. CA-94-1429-H (D. Md. Mar. 2, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/60/f3d/822 · .json · Public domain