Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

60 F.3d 824

Docket No. 95-6412.

Singletary v. Smith

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: May 18, 1995. Decided: June 28, 1995.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-06-28

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Peerless Eagle Coal Company v. Escar E. Taylor Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-06-28

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Jerome A. Singletary, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, MD, for Appellees.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Singletary v. Smith, No. CA-94-1516-HAR (D. Md Feb. 22, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED.

/60/f3d/824 · .json · Public domain