Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 60 F.3d 906 - Rubinovitz v. Rogato

Rubinovitz v. Rogato’s Empirical Analysis

60 F.3d 906 · 1995

Citation profile

136
cited by 136 later decisions
5
states following
February 2025
most recently cited

41 federal appellate · 55 district · 15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 136 later decisions — most recently February 2025 · most notably Cadlerock Properties Joint Venture, L.P. v. Commissioner of Environmental Protection (2000), Mulero-Rodrguez v. Ponte Inc (1996)

41 federal appellate · 55 district · 15 state decisions

5701995200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1985

Relies on Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Mesnick v. General Electric Co. · Withrow v. Williams · Correa-Martinez v. Arrillaga-Belendez · Dartmouth Review v. Dartmouth College

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 136 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “based on impermissible considerations such as race, religion, intent to inhibit or punish the exercise of constitutional rights, or malicious or bad faith intent to injure a person”
    15 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “situated similarly in all relevant aspects were treated differently....”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a malicious orchestrated campaign causing substantial harm”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.