Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 60 FRD 121 - Jarosiewicz v. Conlisk

Jarosiewicz v. Conlisk’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
March 1999
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently March 1999

1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

60197319801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988

Relies on 306 F. Supp. 277 - Sanberg v. Daley · 223 F. Supp. 731 - Jordan v. Kelly · Barrows v. Faulkner · Patrum v. Martin · 298 F. Supp. 1351 - MacK v. Lewis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The court may upon motion order that the testimony at a deposition be recorded by other than stenographic means, in which event the order shall designate the manner of recording, preserving, and filing the deposition, and may include other provisions to assure that the recorded testimony will be accurate and trustworthy. If the order is made, a party may nevertheless arrange to have a stenographic transcription made at his own expense.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “will be expected to attempt to fashion a realistic and practical method and procedure for recording the desired depositions which would be reasonably acceptable to defendants.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.