60 F. Supp. 2d 558 - Dorer v. Arel’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1114 (§ 32 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act)) · 15 U.S.C. § 1117 (§ 35 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act)) · 28 U.S.C. § 634
Relies on Panavision International, L.P. v. Toeppen · 33 F. Supp. 2d 488 - Washington Speakers Bureau, Inc. v. Leading Authorities, Inc. · McClaskey v. Harbison-Walker Refractories Co. · United States v. Harkins Builders, Incorporated · In Re Lamm
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a domain name registration is the product of a contract for services between the registrar and registrant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.