Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 60 FSUPP3D 525 - Microsoft Corp. v. Samsung Electronics Co.

Microsoft Corp. v. Samsung Electronics Co.’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
August 2018
most recently cited

1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp. · First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. Kaplan · Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. Randolph · Painewebber Inc. v. Bybyk · Louis Dreyfus Negoce S.A. v. Blystad Shipping & Trading Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “specific disputes related to reporting, accounting, and auditing”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.