Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 60 Haw. 8 - State v. Erickson

State v. Erickson’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
states following
June 2020
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently June 2020

15 state decisions

80197819801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Neff · Commonwealth v. Simione · Commonwealth v. Harvard · Roy v. State · State v. Kelsey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In Kelsey , the defendant was charged with the knowing and illegal distribution of a dangerous drug. That charge permitted proof of any act which fell within the statutory definition of “distribute” contained in HRS Sec. 712-1240(11). As a consequence, although the evidence showed that the defendant had not acted for himself but for an undercover police agent, he was not entitled to a judgment of acquittal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “We agree with the substantial body of eases which have held that to sell does not mean to buy and that one who acts as the agent of the buyer to effect a purchase of a drug with the buyer’s funds does not commit the offense of selling the drug.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the State is limited to proving the particulars specified in the bill.” (Citations omitted.) Recognizing that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.