State v. Dunn’s Empirical Analysis
1939
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently October 1974
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 62 Cal. App. 22 - People v. Cockrill · 20 Cal. App. 586 - People v. Anthony · State v. Guthrie · 101 Cal. App. 84 - People v. Bryant · 59 Cal. App. 305 - Chrisman v. Superior Court
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is next contended it was prejudicial error to admit in evidence eleven other contracts all purportedly fictitious and made by appellant. The charge being the obtaining of money under false pretenses involving intent the evidence of similar offenses by the same defendant, part of the same fraudulent scheme, was clearly admissible.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Polson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.