¶1In this case, the seventh instruction for the defendant was, that the indorser of a note could not be held without demand and notice. This, under our statute, was erroneous.
¶2The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
¶3Judgment reversed.
60 Ill. 528
Harding v. Dilley
Decided September 15, 1871
Illinois Supreme Court · decided 1871-09-15
<p>Appeal from tbe Circuit Court of Warren county; the Hon. Arthur A. Smith, Judge, presiding.</p> <p>This was an action of assumpsit, brought by Nathan G. Harding and Alvin Bryan against John W. Dilley, as in-dorser of a. promissory note made by one Seneca S. Lake, to defendant, and by him indorsed to the plaintiffs. Upon a trial in the circuit court judgment was rendered in favor of the defendant, from which the plaintiffs appeal.</p>
Decided 1871-09-15