Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 60 Ill. 2d 185 - Repaskey v. Chicago Transit Authority

60 Ill. 2d 185 - Repaskey v. Chicago Transit Authority’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
1
states following
December 2001
most recently cited

32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently December 2001 · most notably 67 Ill. 2d 506 - Fujimura v. Chicago Transit Authority (1977), 64 Ill. 2d 230 - Dunbar v. Reiser (1976)

32 state decisions

1601975198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 48 Ill. 2d 339 - Reynolds v. City of Tuscola · 51 Ill. 2d 357 - Housewright v. City of LaHarpe · 53 Ill. 2d 405 - Helle v. Brush · 9 Ill. App. 3d 897 - Repaskey v. Chicago Transit Authority

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Section 8 — 102 is unambiguous and clearly expresses the legislative intent that a local public entity be given certain information, in writing, within the time provided, and we hold that the allegation of actual notice does not satisfy the statutory requirement of written notice.” 51 Ill. 2d 357, 361 , 282 N.E.2d 437 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““No civil action shall be commenced in any court against the Authority by any person for any injury to his person unless it is commenced within one year from the date that the injury was received or the cause of action accrued. Within six (6) months from the date that such an injury was received or such cause of action accrued, any person who is about to commence any civil action in any court against the Authority for damages on account of any injury to his person shall file in the office of the secretary of the Board and also in the office of the General Attorney for the Authority either by himself, his agent, or attorney, a statement, in writing, signed by himself, his agent, or attorney, giving the name of the person to whom the cause of action has accrued, the name and residence of the person injured, the date and about the hour of the accident, the place or location where the accident occurred and the name and address of the attending physician, if any. If the notice provided for by this section is not filed as provided, any such civil action commenced against the Authority shall be dismissed and the person to whom any such cause of action accrued for any personal injury shall be forever barred from further suing.” (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch. 111 2/3, par. 341.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.