Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 60 KAN 639 - McClain v. Jones

McClain v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis

1899

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
November 1949
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently November 1949

8 state decisions

50189919001910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Conaway v. Gore · Buettinger v. Hurley · Park v. Busenbark

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The thing in dispute in forcible detainer, and forcible entry and detainer, is not the title to the real estate but the mere right to its possession.' In such class of actions the title to the real estate is often involved, but it is involved as an incident only and not as the main subject of controversy.”. (See, also, Conaway v. Gore, 27 Kan. 122 .)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.