60 Kan. App. 2d 48 - State v. Scheuerman’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “amount of methamphetamine. The only difference between the four possible felony classifications for this crime lies in the amount of methamphetamine possessed. Consequently, the quantitative ranges of lesser included offenses under this statute are wholly contained within the quantitative ranges of greater offenses. 7. Under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and section 15 of the Kansas Constitution Bill of Rights, an individual must have a sufficient interest in an area searched—often called”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Scheuerman

2. “In a Memorandum of Decision issued after trial, the district court found Scheuerman guilty of possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute under 5 K.S.A. 2016 Supp. 21-5705(a)(1) and (d)(3)(B). The district court ultimately sentenced Scheuerman to 73 months in prison, with 36 months' postrelease supervision. Scheuerman then appealed. On appeal, the panel bypassed the district court's basis for denying Scheuerman's motion to suppress by concluding that, as a passenger, he lacked”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Scheuerman

3. “[a]s it relates to lesser included offenses whose elements are wholly contained within the originally charged crime, . . . if the facts are sufficient to convict of the charged crime, the facts are also sufficient to convict of a lesser included crime.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
   e.g. State v. Scheuerman