Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 60 MASSAPPCT 362 - Picard v. Thomas

Picard v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

4 district · 8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Kourouvacilis v. General Motors Corp. · Mullins v. Pine Manor College · King v. Driscoll · McNamara v. Honeyman · Adamian v. Three Sons, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This Part is similar to Compulsory Bodily Injury To Others (Part 1).... [L]ike the Compulsory Part, this Part does not pay for the benefit of anyone using an auto without the consent of the owner.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “We will pay only if you or someone else using your auto with your consent is legally responsible for the accident.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Part 5. Optional Bodily Injury to Others”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.