People v. Beadle’s Empirical Analysis
1886
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently March 1939
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kurtz v. People
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The propriety of such an inhibition is apparent to all, and it must be observed and protected by the courts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“If allowed to stand, the beneficent purpose of the Constitution is nullified and set at defiance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““No law shall embrace more than one object which shall be expressed in its title.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.