¶1delivered the opinion of the court.
¶2The appellant was a mere licensee as to the occupancy of the land, He had no estate in it. There was no term, and he was not a termor, and was not entitled to notice to quit. Wood’s L. & T., sect. 227, et seq.; Taylor’s L. & T., sects. 25, 60, 471.
¶3Judgment affirmed.