¶1delivered the opinion of tlie court.
¶2The only question in this case is, whether tlie court.decided rightly in giving judgment in favor of the defendant on the pleadings.
¶3The action was brought on two promissory notes, and the answer pleaded a failure of consideration, and alleged that they were given on account of the assignment of a contract that plaintiff had with the St. Joseph and Denver City Railroad Compauv, by which the company agreed to give plaintiff the right to transfer freight and passengers from St. Joseph across the Missouri river to El wood, and from the latter place back to the former; for which it was agreed that plaintiff, or his assigns, should receive certain specified rates; that the company refused to recognize defendant, or permit him to have anything to do with the business, and so the consideration for which the notes were given entirely failed.
¶4To this answer a replication was filed, in which it was denied that the consideration failed, or that the company refused to recognize defendant, or allow him to proceed under the contract.
¶5Upon this state of the pleadings, the court, without hearing any evidence, on motion, rendered judgment for defendant.
¶6The answer stated a good defense, but after the denials in the replication, its averments should have been proved by evidence. The contract was certainly assignable with the consent of the railroad company, and whether the company agreed to or repudiated the assignment was the only important issue in the case, and that could only be determined by introducing testimony.
¶7Wherefore the judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded ;