Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

60 N.H. 167

Blodgett v. Stone

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 5, 1880

Supreme Court of New Hampshire · decided 1880-06-05

Case, for diverting tlie water of a natural stream from tlie plaintiff’s aqueduct.

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently June 1989

1 district · 1 state decisions

Relies on Bassett v. Salisbury Manufacturing Co. · Tillotson v. Smith · Woodman v. Tufts

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1880-06-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Clark, J.

¶1 The facts stated in the brief statement constituted no defence, and. it was properly rejected. The proceedings in the bill in equity ware immaterial. No decree was entered up. If the judge who heard the application for a temporary injunction denied it on the merits, it would not be a bar to a subsequent hearing on the bill, and it is no bar to this suit. The request for instructions, that the defendant was not liable unless his act caused actual damage to the plaintiff, was rightly refused. The plaintiff was entitled to a verdict for nominal damages upon proof of the infringement of his right, although no actual injury was shown. Tillotson v. Smith, 32 N. H. 90 ; Bassett v. Company, 28 N. H. 438; Woodman v. Tufts, 9 N. H. 88; Munroe v. Stickney, 48 Me. 462; Chaffee v. Pease, 10 Allen 537; Stowell v. Lincoln, 11 Gray 434.

¶2 Judgment on the verdict.

Smith, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
/60/nh/167 · .json · Public domain