Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

60 N.H. 355

Pierce v. Pierce

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 5, 1880

Supreme Court of New Hampshire · decided 1880-12-05

Assumpsit, to recover the balance due on two notes signed by the defendant, payable to the order of Franklin Pierce, deceased, and. endorsed by his executor to the plaintiff. Plea, general issue. There was an indoi-sement of a partial payment on each of the notes, which the evidence tended to show was made in pursuance of the written common-law award of a referee mutually chosen by the defendant and the executor.

Relies on Truesdale v. Straw

Decided 1880-12-05

Blodgett, J.

¶1 Truesdale v. Straw, 58 N. H. 207, is a decisive authority against the defendant; but, without regard to that case, we think there is no ground for holding that a common-law award can be impeached in any proceeding, simply for the allowance of claims barred by the statute of limitations.

¶2 .Exceptions overruled.

Stanley, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
/60/nh/355 · .json · Public domain