Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

60 N.H. 513

Ely v. Curtis

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 5, 1881

Supreme Court of New Hampshire · decided 1881-06-05

Assumpsit. The plaintiff contended that the debt was not discharged in bankruptcy because created by the defendant’s fraud. Facts found by a referee.

Relies on Neal v. Clark · Wolf v. Stix

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1881-06-05

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently November 1968

8 state decisions

20188118901900191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Doe, C. J.

¶1 The fraud must be actual, and not mere fraud in law. Neal v. Clark, 95 U. S. 704; Wolf v. Stix, 99 U. S. 1, 7. The referee has reported evidence, and has not decided the general question of fraud.

¶2 Case discharged.

Stanley and Blodgett, JJ.,did not sit: the others concurred.
/60/nh/513 · .json · Public domain