Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 60 NY 183 - Holmes v. . Hubbard

Holmes v. . Hubbard’s Empirical Analysis

1875

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
July 1939
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 1939

9 state decisions

501875188018901900191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “it is a rule for the construction of all written instruments, conveying property, that if a general clause be followed by special words, the instrument shall be construed according to the special matterand in the application of this rule it is held that the general words of an assign ment should be restricted by a subsequent clause referring to a schedule annexed for a more full description;”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.