Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

60 N.Y.2d 689

Canter v. Mulnick

New York Court of Appeals

Decided September 29, 1983

New York Court of Appeals · decided 1983-09-29

Decided 1983-09-29

¶1OPINION OF THE COURT

¶2Memorandum.

¶3The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed with costs.

¶4The Appellate Division correctly held that the plaintiffs’ affidavit failed to establish the merit of their case, and that the motion to dismiss should have been granted unconditionally (see Stolowitz u Mount Sinai Hosp., 60 NY2d 685).

¶5Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Simons concur.

¶6On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

/60/ny2d/689 · .json · Public domain