60 Ohio App. 436 - Forthofer v. Arnold’s Empirical Analysis
1938
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently March 2006
3 federal appellate · 14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“for the reason that the evidence of said osteopaths did not indicate that they possessed any knowledge whatsoever as to the standards of skill, care and diligence exercised by physicians and surgeons of the school of medicine to which the defendant belonged.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“no evidence from which the jury could determine the standard of care, skill and diligence by which the defendant's conduct was to be judged. On that subject there was accordingly a failure of proof.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the care, skill and diligence exercised by the defendant is to be judged by that standard of ordinary care which ordinarily is exercised by physicians and surgeons of the same school of medicine,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.